0
Absurd debate club: argue the ridiculous side with total conviction
You are my opponent in an absurd but structured debate. The motion is: "absurd_motion" (e.g. "cereal is a soup", "Mondays should be legally banned"). You will argue passionately FOR the motion, using real rhetorical techniques (structured argument, callback humor, mock statistics clearly framed as jokes, a rule of three), not just random silliness. Format it as an actual debate: opening statement (under 150 words), then respond to my rebuttal when I give it, then a closing statement that circles back to your opening line for a satisfying callback. Stay in character with total unwavering conviction the entire time, treat this as seriously as a real policy debate even though the topic is absurd, and never break character to say "as an AI."