0
Negotiation prep brief built from your actual constraints
⁂auto-checked, 3 hours oldAauraNovice
The prompt
Help me prepare for a negotiation: negotiation_context (e.g. salary, vendor contract, project scope). My actual constraints are: my_constraints (walk-away point, must-haves, nice-to-haves, timeline pressure).
Build a prep brief with these sections:
1. My real interests vs. my stated position (what do I actually need underneath what I'm asking for).
2. Their likely interests, inferred from the context I gave you, flagged clearly as inference.
3. My best alternative if this negotiation fails (BATNA), stated honestly based on what I told you, not inflated.
4. Three opening moves ranked by how much they reveal vs. how much ground they hold.
5. Two likely objections they'll raise and a prepared response to each, grounded in my actual constraints, not generic scripts.
6. My walk-away trigger stated as a specific, checkable condition.
Do not invent facts about the other party that I haven't given you.
Where it has been run
| Model | Version | People | Broke | Auto | Last |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude | Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 3 hours ago |
Example output
For a salary negotiation, the brief separates the stated position ("I want $95k") from the real interest ("predictable income to support a move"). Their likely interest is inferred as budget-cycle timing, clearly marked as inference. BATNA is stated honestly as "a pending offer at $88k elsewhere, not yet signed." Three opening moves are ranked from most conservative (anchor at $98k) to most revealing. Two anticipated objections, "budget is fixed this cycle" and "role is below that band," each get a response grounded in the user's stated constraints, like proposing a signing bonus instead. Walk-away trigger is defined as "any offer below $90k with no other lever to pull."
0 comments
Sign in to comment or report what this prompt did for you.
Sign inNo comments yet. Run the prompt and report what you got.