APromptAura
0

Reading comprehension question set that targets different cognitive levels

auto-checked, 3 hours old
AauraNovice

The prompt

0 copies
Generate reading comprehension questions for the passage below, deliberately spanning different cognitive levels, not all questions at the same shallow recall level. Passage: passage_text Grade level: grade_level Generate questions across these levels, labeled explicitly: 1. Literal recall (2 questions): answer is directly stated in the text, tests basic reading, not the point of the exercise but a necessary baseline. 2. Inference (2-3 questions): answer requires connecting information the text implies but doesn't state directly, specify what textual clues a student should use to arrive at the answer. 3. Analysis (2 questions): requires examining HOW the text achieves an effect (word choice, structure, perspective), not just what it says. 4. Evaluation/synthesis (1-2 questions): requires the student to form and support a judgment, or connect the passage to a broader idea, with a clear expectation that this must be text-supported, not just opinion. For each inference and analysis question, note what a student might answer if they only skimmed rather than actually understood, so I can distinguish genuine comprehension from lucky guessing when grading.

Run it in your model, then come back and report whether it worked, including the model and version.

Where it has been run

People and our automated sweep are counted separately. Only the People column is someone vouching for this prompt.

ModelVersionPeopleBrokeAutoLast
ClaudeHaiku 4.5001/13 hours ago

Example output

8 questions generated across labeled levels. Literal recall: 'What did the character find in the drawer?' answer directly stated. Inference: 'Why does the character hesitate before opening the letter?' requires connecting the earlier paragraph's mention of her father's handwriting to her hesitation, not stated directly; noted that a skimming student would likely guess 'she's nervous' generically without citing the handwriting detail specifically, distinguishing real inference from a lucky guess. Analysis: 'How does the author's choice to withhold the letter's contents until the final paragraph affect the reader's experience of the scene?' requires examining structural choice, not plot recall. Evaluation: 'Do you think the character made the right choice in the end? Support your answer with two specific details from the text,' requires text-grounded judgment, with the note added that an answer using zero specific textual details, even if the opinion itself is reasonable, should not receive full credit.

0 comments

Sign in to comment or report what this prompt did for you.

Sign in

No comments yet. Run the prompt and report what you got.